<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Epistemology and science	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.telework.ro/en/epistemology-and-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/epistemology-and-science/</link>
	<description>Știință și filosofie, afaceri online (web design, marketing, traduceri, cărți online, rețele sociale), artă. Știința informației (data science, business intelligence).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Collenburg Monteiro		</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/epistemology-and-science/#comment-95874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Collenburg Monteiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=82083#comment-95874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Simply brilliant.  I perceived this conceptual framework formally and began to articulate it within the last three years, and at least one additional implication about the problem of &quot;objectivity,&quot; and another on the legitimacy of spiritual-religious epistemology(ies).  I note the total absence of the latter in your otherwise clearheaded arrangement.  The issue that you raise as an example on ethics, economics and fragile populations meets most conventional thinking and elements on spiritual-religious epistemologies, for one, and the &quot;freedom from metaphysics&quot; of &quot;scientific realism and ontology.&quot;  Wonderful to find your stuff!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply brilliant.  I perceived this conceptual framework formally and began to articulate it within the last three years, and at least one additional implication about the problem of &#8220;objectivity,&#8221; and another on the legitimacy of spiritual-religious epistemology(ies).  I note the total absence of the latter in your otherwise clearheaded arrangement.  The issue that you raise as an example on ethics, economics and fragile populations meets most conventional thinking and elements on spiritual-religious epistemologies, for one, and the &#8220;freedom from metaphysics&#8221; of &#8220;scientific realism and ontology.&#8221;  Wonderful to find your stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
