<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>falsifiability Archives - MultiMedia</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.telework.ro/en/tag/falsifiability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/tag/falsifiability/</link>
	<description>Știință și filosofie, afaceri online (web design, marketing, traduceri, cărți online, rețele sociale), artă. Știința informației (data science, business intelligence).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2257885</site>	<item>
		<title>Criticisms of falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/criticisms-of-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/criticisms-of-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 23:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=111879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Criticisms (Scientific method in the three worlds. ) To introduce this section, it is useful to recall the central points of Popperian philosophy which are conducive to a critical analysis of refutability. For Popper, falsifiability concerns only the logical relationship &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/criticisms-of-falsifiability/" aria-label="Criticisms of falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/criticisms-of-falsifiability/">Criticisms of falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/criticisms-of-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">111879</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Objectivity and intersubjectivity in falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/objectivity-and-intersubjectivity-in-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/objectivity-and-intersubjectivity-in-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersubjectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectivity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=111242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Before Popper, Kant had proposed a solution to Hume&#8217;s problem that also called for knowledge that relates to the world of observations while preceding those observations. The difference is that, for Kant, this knowledge is a priori truths, which puts &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/objectivity-and-intersubjectivity-in-falsifiability/" aria-label="Objectivity and intersubjectivity in falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/objectivity-and-intersubjectivity-in-falsifiability/">Objectivity and intersubjectivity in falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/objectivity-and-intersubjectivity-in-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">111242</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bayesian approach in the context of falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/bayesian-approach-in-the-context-of-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/bayesian-approach-in-the-context-of-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 22:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayesian approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=111095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Among the attempts to dismantle the first horn of Hume&#8217;s fork, Henderson mentions Kant&#8217;s approach discussed later and that of Bayes. Bayesian logic is not ampliative: it does not provide more information than that contained in the premises and observations. &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/bayesian-approach-in-the-context-of-falsifiability/" aria-label="Bayesian approach in the context of falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/bayesian-approach-in-the-context-of-falsifiability/">Bayesian approach in the context of falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/bayesian-approach-in-the-context-of-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">111095</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Popper on falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/karl-popper-on-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/karl-popper-on-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Popper]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=110984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Popper, falsifiability provides a solution to the problem of induction, raised by Hume, and to that of demarcation, which he also calls Kant&#8217;s problem. Popper explains that he was influenced by Kant, but benefited from a different context: &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/karl-popper-on-falsifiability/" aria-label="Karl Popper on falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/karl-popper-on-falsifiability/">Karl Popper on falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/karl-popper-on-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">110984</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crucial experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem of demarcation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem of induction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=101193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Falsifiability (also referred to as the use of refutability) was introduced by Karl Popper and is considered an important concept in epistemology, allowing to draw a line between scientific theories and those that are not. An assertion, a hypothesis, is &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/falsifiability/" aria-label="Falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/falsifiability/">Falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">101193</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dogmatic Falsificationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imre Lakatos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific theories]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=87092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sfetcu, Nicolae (2019). &#8220;Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism&#8221;, in Telework, URL = https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/ &#160; Abstract Dogmatic (naturalist) falsificationism accepts the falsifiability of all scientific theories without qualification but preserves an infallible empirical basis. He is strictly empiric without being inductivist: he &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/" aria-label="Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/">Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">87092</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support and trend of falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/support-and-trend-of-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/support-and-trend-of-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demarcation criterion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demarcation of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Popper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=86774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Popper&#8217;s supporters argued that most criticism is based on an incomprehensible interpretation of his ideas. They argue that Popper should not be interpreted as meaning that falsifiability is a sufficient condition for the demarcation of science. Some passages seem to &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/support-and-trend-of-falsifiability/" aria-label="Support and trend of falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/support-and-trend-of-falsifiability/">Support and trend of falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/support-and-trend-of-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">86774</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criticism of Falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/criticism-of-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/criticism-of-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imre Lakatos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Popper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rational reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Kuhn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=86729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Kuhn criticized falsifiability because it characterized &#8220;the entire scientific enterprise in terms that apply only to its occasional revolutionary parts,&#8221; (Kuhn 1970) and it cannot be generalized. In Kuhn&#8217;s view, a delimitation criterion must refer to the functioning of &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/criticism-of-falsifiability/" aria-label="Criticism of Falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/criticism-of-falsifiability/">Criticism of Falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/criticism-of-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">86729</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falsification and refutation</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/falsification-and-refutation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/falsification-and-refutation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 06:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Popper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refutation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=86702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dogmatic falsifiability refers to scientific statements considered individually. These can be falsified and, depending on the outcome, scientific theories can be considered falsifiable and accepted, refuted, or can be maintained by adding ad-hoc hypotheses: ” There is one important method &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/falsification-and-refutation/" aria-label="Falsification and refutation">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/falsification-and-refutation/">Falsification and refutation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/falsification-and-refutation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">86702</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science and pseudoscience &#8211; Falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demarcation problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifiability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Popper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?p=86407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The delimitation between science and pseudoscience is part of the more general task of determining which beliefs are epistemologically justified. Science can be described as partly descriptive, partly normative. A definition of science can focus on descriptive content and specify &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/" aria-label="Science and pseudoscience &#8211; Falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/">Science and pseudoscience &#8211; Falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">86407</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
