<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>falsifiability Archives - MultiMedia</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.telework.ro/en/ebook-author/falsifiability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/ebook-author/falsifiability/</link>
	<description>Știință și filosofie, afaceri online (web design, marketing, traduceri, cărți online, rețele sociale), artă. Știința informației (data science, business intelligence).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 03:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2257885</site>	<item>
		<title>Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?post_type=product&#038;p=109554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sfetcu, Nicolae (2019). &#8220;Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism&#8221;, in Telework, URL = https://www.telework.ro/en/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/ &#160; Abstract Dogmatic (naturalist) falsificationism accepts the falsifiability of all scientific theories without qualification but preserves an infallible empirical basis. He is strictly empiric without being inductivist: he &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/" aria-label="Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/">Lakatos on Dogmatic Falsificationism</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/lakatos-on-dogmatic-falsificationism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">109554</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falsification and refutation</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/falsification-and-refutation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/falsification-and-refutation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 15:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?post_type=product&#038;p=102502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A scientific theory, according to Popper, can be legitimately saved from falsification by introducing an auxiliary hypothesis to generate new, falsifiable predictions. Also, if there are suspicions of bias or error, the researchers might introduce an auxiliary falsifiable hypothesis that &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/falsification-and-refutation/" aria-label="Falsification and refutation">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/falsification-and-refutation/">Falsification and refutation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/falsification-and-refutation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">102502</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science and pseudoscience &#8211; Falsifiability</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?post_type=product&#038;p=100119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The delimitation between science and pseudoscience is part of the more general task of determining which beliefs are epistemologically justified. Standards for demarcation may vary by domain, but several basic principles are universally accepted. Karl Popper proposed falsifiability as an &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/" aria-label="Science and pseudoscience &#8211; Falsifiability">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/">Science and pseudoscience &#8211; Falsifiability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/science-and-pseudoscience-falsifiability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">100119</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Popper’s demarcation problem</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/karl-poppers-demarcation-problem/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/karl-poppers-demarcation-problem/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 10:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?post_type=product&#038;p=100045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karl Popper, as a critical rationalist, was an opponent of all forms of skepticism, conventionalism and relativism in science. A major argument of Popper is Hume&#8217;s critique of induction, arguing that induction should never be used in science. But he &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/karl-poppers-demarcation-problem/" aria-label="Karl Popper’s demarcation problem">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/karl-poppers-demarcation-problem/">Karl Popper’s demarcation problem</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/karl-poppers-demarcation-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">100045</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper</title>
		<link>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/the-distinction-between-falsification-and-refutation-in-the-demarcation-problem-of-karl-popper/</link>
					<comments>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/the-distinction-between-falsification-and-refutation-in-the-demarcation-problem-of-karl-popper/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolae Sfetcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.telework.ro/?post_type=product&#038;p=86809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dive into the debate and redefine how you view science, truth, and discovery.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/the-distinction-between-falsification-and-refutation-in-the-demarcation-problem-of-karl-popper/">The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.telework.ro/en">MultiMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/the-distinction-between-falsification-and-refutation-in-the-demarcation-problem-of-karl-popper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">86809</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
