Interesting point. Naming by recipient is a kind of sweet spot on the speturcm of possible labels: sender-recipient-subject. It’s specific enough to be memorable yet general enough to feel timeless. There’s a double edge though because it obscures the fact that Paul’s commands were often quite parochial.Imagine Galatians being titled “Sticking it to Cephas” or 1 Thess titled “How to prep for Christ’s certain return in the next few years”Sean
Ayesa
Interesting point. Naming by recipient is a kind of sweet spot on the speturcm of possible labels: sender-recipient-subject. It’s specific enough to be memorable yet general enough to feel timeless. There’s a double edge though because it obscures the fact that Paul’s commands were often quite parochial.Imagine Galatians being titled “Sticking it to Cephas” or 1 Thess titled “How to prep for Christ’s certain return in the next few years”Sean