Home » Articole » EN » Society » Philosophy » Animals » Criticisms of the concept of animal welfare

Criticisms of the concept of animal welfare

posted in: Animals 0

In the old days, many people thought that animals couldn’t feel anything and therefore had no self-interest. Many Cartesians seem to have taken this view, although according to John Cottingham, Descartes himself did not defend such a point of view. This type of point of view may have been held by certain behaviorists as well, despite the logical flaw in the passage from “there is no scientific proof that these rats in my laboratory, suffer” to “these rats in my laboratory, do not. not suffer”. In addition, the behaviorist perspective on what constitutes scientific evidence makes it impossible to examine problems concerning suffering.

Others feel that too much emphasis is placed on animal welfare, even though human welfare or basic human rights are still not met for many humans. They cite Africa and many other parts of the world affected by poverty and other problems, sometimes on the rise. These detractors sometimes demand from animal rights activists that before claiming animal rights, they begin by improving the living conditions of their fellow human beings, many of whom live in conditions comparable to, or even worse, those of certain animals.

This criticism assumes the speciesist premise that human suffering deserves greater consideration than any suffering suffered by a non-human animal. Antispeciesists reject this opinion, considering on the contrary that all suffering deserves the same consideration, whatever the species of being who is subjected to it.

More recently, other critics have used Wittgenstein-inspired arguments to defend the idea that certain types of suffering or joy are only accessible to beings who are able to use language. They claim that only humans, bonobos and chimpanzees have this linguistic ability. But logically the fact that humans can feel certain particular sufferings does not mean that one should not seek to eliminate the other types of suffering.

Sometimes opponents of extending animal welfare claim that plants have also feelings, an argument also called the carrot cry.

Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the law of universal gravitation
Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the law of universal gravitation

One of the most disputed controversy over the priority of scientific discoveries is that of the law of universal gravitation, between Isaac Newton and Robert Hooke. Hooke accused Newton of plagiarism, of taking over his ideas expressed in previous works. … Read More

not rated 0.00 Select options
Epistemology of Intelligence Agencies
Epistemology of Intelligence Agencies

About the analogy between the epistemological and methodological aspects of the activity of intelligence agencies and some scientific disciplines, advocating for a more scientific approach to the process of collecting and analyzing information within the intelligence cycle. I assert that … Read More

not rated 0.00 Select options
Philosophical Essays
Philosophical Essays

A collection of personal essays in philosophy of science (physics, especially gravity), philosophy of information and communication technology, current social issues (emotional intelligence, COVID-19 pandemic, eugenics, intelligence), philosophy of art, and logic and philosophy of language. CONTENTS: The distinction between … Read More

not rated 5.31 Select options

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *