Home » Articole » Articles » Science » Physics » Henri Poincaré, Mathematical physics: 1 – Dirichlet’s problem

Henri Poincaré, Mathematical physics: 1 – Dirichlet’s problem

When we consider the various problems of integral calculus which naturally arise when we want to go deeper into the most different parts of physics, it is impossible not to be struck by the analogies that all these problems present to each other. Whether it concerns static or dynamic electricity, the propagation of heat, optics, elasticity, hydrodynamics, one is always led to differential equations of the same family and the boundary conditions, although different, are nevertheless not without offering some resemblances. We will cite only a few examples here.

I imagine first that one proposes to find the final temperature of a conductive, homogeneous and isotropic solid body, when the various points of the surface of this body are maintained artificially at given temperatures. This problem translates into analytic language if not this as follows:

Find a function V which in a portion of space satisfies the Laplace equation,

ΔV = d2V/dx2 + d2V/dy2 + d2V/dz2 = 0

and which takes given values at the various points of the surface which limits this space.

This is Dirichlet’s problem.

Suppose now that one seeks what is the distribution of static electricity on the surface of a given conductor; we shall encounter the same analytical problem.

It is a question of finding a function V which satisfies the Laplace equation in all the space exterior to the conductor and which reduces to 0 at infinity and to 1 at the surface to the conductor.

It is a special case of Dirichlet’s problem, but we know a way (by Green’s functions) to reduce the general case to this particular case.

The two problems, absolutely different from the physical point of view, are identical from the analytical point of view.

Other analogies, though less complete, are however obvious.

Source: H. Poincaré, Sur les Equations aux Dérivées Partielles de la Physique Mathématique, American Journal of Mathematics, Mar., 1890, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Mar., 1890), pp. 211-294. Translation by Nicolae Sfetcu. © 2022 Nicolae Sfetcu

How to Translate – English Translation Guide in European Union
How to Translate – English Translation Guide in European Union

A guide for translators, about the translation theory, the translation process, interpreting, subtitling, internationalization and localization and computer-assisted translation. A special section is dedicated to the translator’s education and associations. The guide include, as annexes, several independent adaptations of the … Read More

not rated 28.23 lei Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page
EU Translation Guide
EU Translation Guide

Edited and published as e-book by Nicolae Sfetcu European Commission staff have to write many different types of documents. Whatever the type – legislation, a technical report, minutes, a press release or speech – a clear document will be more … Read More

not rated 0.00 lei Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page
Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the law of universal gravitation
Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the law of universal gravitation

One of the most disputed controversy over the priority of scientific discoveries is that of the law of universal gravitation, between Isaac Newton and Robert Hooke. Hooke accused Newton of plagiarism, of taking over his ideas expressed in previous works. … Read More

not rated 0.00 lei Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *